There are certain serious mistakes that every web designer needs to stay away from in as far as white label CMSs are concerned. First, web designers are supposed to have full awareness of any content management system, whether or not it is open source, which suggests that its enormous following should be the reason for using the system. It is not a good idea to fall for either the assurance of a large, supportive user community or the attractive plugins and extensions that that particular system is offering. This is merely a trap. The point is that the goodness of a white label CMS for designers is not in any way dependent on the number of individuals who are using it. In other words, choosing a white label CMS on the basis of the following it has gathered could be totally misleading.

Related image

The other reason why a large proportion of individuals will prefer such kinds of white label content management systems is that in their perception, there is an extraordinarily big community of web designers or some substantial quantity of money behind some specific web application. To those who choose such kinds of content management systems, it is important to consider the very famous and relevant quote from Steve Jobs, “I wish developing great products was as easy as writing a check. If that was the case, Microsoft would have great products.” In this particular statement, Jobs was trying to explain the reason why a success-oriented person should never be the behemoth.  According to the online business guru, the individuals behind the final product are not only the most important but also the right individuals to undertake the task. It is not the number of individuals working for someone that matters. Considering the open source white label content management system, it is not a strange phenomenon to discover that there is no one who tracks the development or finds the perfect individuals to produce what is highly needed by others. In such a case, it is the average member of the community who is considered the primary foundation of functionality and the outcome tends to be an enormous heap of average functionality and extensions with just a handful of pieces buried too deep to be found easily. Generally, it is highly recommendable that one confirms that the CMS they are putting into consideration is inclusive of extensions with the required functionality.